Why this exists.
Remote exams broke in a specific way: the software got confident, and the institution got the blame. We built the opposite.
The position
Automated proctoring is good at noticing things and bad at knowing what they mean. A phone on the desk is a fact; whether it is cheating is a judgement. Most tools blur that line because a confident verdict demos better. We keep the line visible: AI produces evidence, a person decides, and the candidate can appeal.
What follows from it
The whole architecture falls out of that one commitment. Detections carry confidence. Violations carry weight you set. Risk is arithmetic you can inspect. A case opens for a human. Decisions carry reasons and history. Appeals reopen the case.
No AI in the exam
The second commitment is quieter but matters more on the day: nothing AI-shaped runs while a candidate is sitting an exam. Translation is frozen at publish; evaluation happens after submission. An outage at a model provider cannot reach a live paper.
Where we are
Exam Center is pre-launch. We have no customers to name, no certifications, and no published SLA — and you will not find invented ones anywhere on this site. What we do have is a platform that is built and demonstrable, and a willingness to tell you exactly where the gaps are.
The company
Exam Center is built by EDMISSION EXAM CENTER AI PRIVATE LIMITED, incorporated in 2026 and registered in Maharashtra, India. We work from Ambernath, Maharashtra, India, as a small founding team — engineers who had built assessment software before and disagreed with how it handled the moment a candidate is accused of something.